The Gold Humanism Honor Society (GHHS) stands as a mark of compassion and empathy in medical education, aiming to recognize students who embody the highest ideals of patient-centered care. Unfortunately, the noble intentions of this prestigious organization are often undermined by a flawed selection process that fails to capture the true essence of humanism in medicine.
At its core, the GHHS seeks to identify and celebrate those medical students who demonstrate exceptional empathy, respect, and compassion in their interactions with patients and colleagues. This recognition is meant to be on par with induction into the esteemed Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society, offering a competitive edge in the residency application process. The current selection methodology, however, falls short of its goals, instead devolving into what many perceive as a popularity contest among medical school classmates.
The crux of the issue lies in the peer nomination process, as recommended by the GHHS when selecting medical students. While peer recognition can be valuable, it often fails to accurately assess a student's genuine empathy and humanistic qualities in patient care. Students rarely observe their classmates in patient care settings so student nominations are often based on speculation rather than true observation. Additionally, medical students’ relative lack of medical expertise and patient care leaves them poorly equipped to identify true humanism in medicine. Instead, it tends to favor those students who are more socially adept or well-connected within their class, potentially overlooking quieter individuals who may excel in compassionate patient interactions yet struggle with self-promotion.
This popularity-driven approach creates a troubling dynamic within medical school classes. Students, aware of the prestige and potential career benefits associated with GHHS membership, may find themselves engaging in a subtle yet intense competition for votes from their peers. This environment not only detracts from the collaborative spirit essential to medical education but also shifts focus away from the true purpose of the honor society — recognizing genuine empathy and humanism in medical practice.
Moreover, the current selection process neglects a crucial perspective — that of the patients themselves. While peer evaluations may offer insights into a student's interpersonal skills within the medical school community, they fail to capture the essence of a student's interactions with patients, which is arguably the most critical aspect of humanism in medicine.
To address these shortcomings, a multifaceted approach to the selection process is necessary. Incorporating patient feedback could provide valuable insights into a student's bedside manner and ability to connect with those under their care. Additionally, evaluations and a nomination process centered around clinical preceptors who observe students in patient care settings and have the experience necessary to identify humanism in medicine would offer a more comprehensive and reliable view of a student's humanistic qualities.
At the time of this writing, applications for the GHHS have yet to be sent out to my cohort. I mention this only to demonstrate to readers this perspective does not come from one of disgruntled rejection from the GHHS. If selected for the GHHS, it would be an honor, but an honor that is frankly undermined by a flawed process in how students are selected for induction. The intention here is not to diminish the accomplishments of those who have obtained this distinction or detract from the society itself, but rather to point out glaring flaws in the selection process that call into question the efficacy of such a society that has effectively conflated humanism with popularity.
What issues do you have with the GHHS? Share in the comments.
Forrest is a third-year medical student interested in rural medicine and how to best address the physician shortage in these areas, as well as being particularly interested in health policy and the way it is applied to different groups of people in the U.S.
Image by Denis Novikov / GettyImages
